4.5 Article

Amygdala Reactivity as a Marker of Differential Susceptibility to Socioeconomic Resources During Early Adulthood

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 12, Pages 2341-2355

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/dev0000600

Keywords

differential susceptibility; amygdala reactivity; socioeconomic resources; emerging adulthood; antisocial behavior

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 MH50907, R01 MH01666, R01 DA026222]
  2. National Science Foundation [1519686]
  3. [T32 HD00710936]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Models of differential susceptibility hypothesize that neural function may be a marker of differential susceptibility to context, but no studies have tested this hypothesis. Using a sample of 310 young men from low-income urban neighborhoods, this study investigated amygdala reactivity to facial expressions as a moderator of the relations between socioeconomic resources and later antisocial behavior (AB) and income. For individuals with high amygdala reactivity, greater socioeconomic resources at age 20 predicted less AB and greater income at age 22. For young men with low amygdala reactivity, however, socioeconomic resources at age 20 did not predict later outcomes. Amygdala reactivity to fearful facial expressions, key to the etiology of AB, moderated links between resources and AB. In contrast, amygdala reactivity more generally to multiple facial expressions moderated the effects of resources on later income attainment. Both interactions met rigorous quantitative criteria for patterns of differential susceptibility rather than diathesis stress or vantage sensitivity. Moreover, these associations remained significant after inclusion of socioeconomic resources during earlier developmental periods. These results suggest that greater amygdala reactivity to facial expressions is a marker of greater susceptibility to context, for better or for worse, during the transition to adulthood.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available