4.8 Article

VDJdb: a curated database of T-cell receptor sequences with known antigen specificity

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 46, Issue D1, Pages D419-D427

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx760

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
  2. European Union's Horizon Research and Innovation Programme [633592]
  3. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic under CEITEC [LQ1601]
  4. Wellcome Trust
  5. Cancer Research Wales PhD Studentship
  6. Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
  7. Wellcome Trust [100326/Z/12/Z] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [633592] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ability to decode antigen specificities encapsulated in the sequences of rearranged T-cell receptor (TCR) genes is critical for our understanding of the adaptive immune system and promises significant advances in the field of translational medicine. Recent developments in high-throughput sequencing methods (immune repertoire sequencing technology, or RepSeq) and single-cell RNA sequencing technology have allowed us to obtain huge numbers of TCR sequences from donor samples and link them to T-cell phenotypes. However, our ability to annotate these TCR sequences still lags behind, owing to the enormous diversity of the TCR repertoire and the scarcity of available data on T-cell specificities. In this paper, we present VDJdb, a database that stores and aggregates the results of published T-cell specificity assays and provides a universal platform that couples antigen specificities with TCR sequences. We demonstrate that VDJdb is a versatile instrument for the annotation of TCR repertoire data, enabling a concatenated view of antigen-specific TCR sequence motifs. VDJdb can be accessed at https://vdjdb.cdr3. net and https://github.com/antigenomics/vdjdb-db.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available