4.8 Article

Enhancing multiplex genome editing by natural transformation (MuGENT) via inactivation of ssDNA exonucleases

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 12, Pages 7527-7537

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx496

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health [AI118863, GM109259]
  2. Indiana University College of Arts and Sciences Startup Funds
  3. European Research Council under the European Community [281590]
  4. Indiana University Startup Funds
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [281590] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, we described a method for multiplex genome editing by natural transformation (MuGENT). Mutant constructs for MuGENT require large arms of homology (>2000 bp) surrounding each genome edit, which necessitates laborious in vitro DNA splicing. In Vibrio cholerae, we uncover that this requirement is due to cytoplasmic ssDNA exonucleases, which inhibit natural transformation. In ssDNA exonuclease mutants, one arm of homology can be reduced to as little as 40 bp while still promoting integration of genome edits at rates of similar to 50% without selection in cis. Consequently, editing constructs are generated in a single polymerase chain reaction where one homology arm is oligonucleotide encoded. To further enhance editing efficiencies, we also developed a strain for transient inactivation of the mismatch repair system. As a proof-of-concept, we used these advances to rapidly mutate 10 high-affinity binding sites for the nucleoid occlusion protein SlmA and generated a duodecuple mutant of 12 diguanylate cyclases in V. cholerae. Whole genome sequencing revealed little to no off-target mutations in these strains. Finally, we show that ssDNA exonucleases inhibit natural transformation in Acinetobacter bay-lyi. Thus, rational removal of ssDNA exonucleases may be broadly applicable for enhancing the efficacy and ease of MuGENT in diverse naturally transformable species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available