4.8 Article

Structural study of the Fox-1 RRM protein hydration reveals a role for key water molecules in RRM-RNA recognition

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 13, Pages 8046-8063

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx418

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Czech Science Foundation [P305/12/G034]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [LO1305]
  3. Praemium Academiae
  4. NCCR RNA and Disease - Swiss National Science Foundation
  5. Institute of Biophysics, AS CR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Fox-1 RNA recognition motif (RRM) domain is an important member of the RRM protein family. We report a 1.8 angstrom X-ray structure of the free Fox-1 containing six distinct monomers. We use this and the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structure of the Fox1 protein/RNA complex for molecular dynamics (MD) analyses of the structured hydration. The individual monomers of the X-ray structure show diverse hydration patterns, however, MD excellently reproduces the most occupied hydration sites. Simulations of the protein/RNA complex show hydration consistent with the isolated protein complemented by hydration sites specific to the protein/RNA interface. MD predicts intricate hydration sites with water-binding times extending up to hundreds of nanoseconds. We characterize two of them using NMR spectroscopy, RNA binding with switchSENSE and free-energy calculations of mutant proteins. Both hydration sites are experimentally confirmed and their abolishment reduces the binding free-energy. A quantitative agreement between theory and experiment is achieved for the S155A substitution but not for the S122A mutant. The S155 hydration site is evolutionarily conserved within the RRM domains. In conclusion, MD is an effective tool for predicting and interpreting the hydration patterns of protein/RNA complexes. Hydration is not easily detectable in NMR experiments but can affect stability of protein/RNA complexes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available