4.6 Article

Research on the Battery Charging Strategy With Charging and Temperature Rising Control Awareness

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages 64193-64201

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2876359

Keywords

Temperature rise; charging time; constant heating rates; electric vehicle; lithium ion battery; SOC region

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51707011]
  2. Key Laboratory of Road Construction Technology and Equipment, Chang'an University, MOE [310825171105, 310825171133]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fast charging of lithium-ion batteries is an essential problem that constrains the large-scale deployment of electric vehicles. To solve this problem, a new charging strategy is proposed in this paper. Three original contributions are made in this paper: 1) development of a novel multistage constant heating rates optimization method that reduces both the charging time and charging temperature increase, with the tradeoff between the charging time and charging temperature increase analyzed using the genetic algorithm (off-line strategy); 2) reduction of the charging time via ensuring a state of charge region by balancing the charge capacity and charge time; and 3) demonstration that the proposed method can be used under different temperatures by comparing the proposed method to the average constant current constant voltage (CCCV) under different temperatures; the comparison results suggest that the charging time of proposed method is reduced by 1.9%, 5.3%, 8.56%, and 9.54% compared to the average CCCV method under ambient temperature, 10 degrees C, 25 degrees C, and 40 degrees C, respectively. Moreover, the proposed method temperature rise is reduced by 48.6%, 28.3%, 67.3%, and 17.9% compared to the average CCCV method under ambient temperature 10 degrees C, 25 degrees C, and 40 degrees C, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available