4.8 Article

DNA mimics of red fluorescent proteins (RFP) based on G-quadruplex-confined synthetic RFP chromophores

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 18, Pages 10380-10392

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx803

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF of China [21235002, 21575038]
  2. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups [21521063]
  3. Young Top-notch Talent for Ten Thousand Talent Program
  4. NSF of Hunan Province [2015JJ1005]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Red fluorescent proteins (RFPs) have emerged as valuable biological markers for biomolecule imaging in living systems. Developing artificial fluorogenic systems that mimic RFPs remains an unmet challenge. Here, we describe the design and synthesis of six new chromophores analogous to the chromophores in RFPs. We demonstrate, for the first time, that encapsulating RFP chromophore analogues in canonical DNA G-quadruplexes (G4) can activate bright fluorescence spanning red and farred spectral regions (Em = 583-668 nm) that nearly match the entire RFP palette. Theoretical calculations and molecular dynamics simulations reveal that DNA G4 greatly restricts radiationless deactivation of chromophores induced by a twisted intramolecular charge transfer (TICT). These DNA mimics of RFP exhibit attractive photophysical properties comparable or superior to natural RFPs, including high quantum yield, large Stokes shifts, excellent anti-photobleaching properties, and two-photon fluorescence. Moreover, these RFP chromophore analogues are a novel and distinctive type of topology-selective G4 probe specific to parallel G4 conformation. The DNA mimics of RFP have been further exploited for imaging of target proteins. Using cancer-specific cell membrane biomarkers as targets, long-term real-time monitoring in single live cell and two-photon fluorescence imaging in tissue sections have been achieved without the need for genetic coding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available