4.4 Article

Persistence of anxiety symptoms after elective caesarean delivery

Journal

BJPSYCH OPEN
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages 354-360

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2018.48

Keywords

Perinatal psychiatry; anxiety disorders; elective caesarean

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [MR/M013960/1]
  2. Waterloo Foundation
  3. MRC GW4 BioMed PhD studentship
  4. BBSRC SWBio PhD studentship
  5. BIOSI PhD studentship
  6. MRC [1942116, MR/M013960/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background In the UK, 11.8% of expectant mothers undergo an elective caesarean section (ELCS) representing 92 000 births per annum. It is not known to what extent this procedure has an impact on mental well-being in the longer term. Aims To determine the prevalence and postpartum progression of anxiety and depression symptoms in women undergoing ELCS in Wales. Method Prevalence of depression and anxiety were determined in women at University Hospital Wales (2015-16; n = 308) through completion of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS; >= 13) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI; >= 40) questionnaires 1 day prior to ELCS, and three postpartum time points for 1 year. Maternal characteristics were determined from questionnaires and, where possible, confirmed from National Health Service maternity records. Results Using these criteria the prevalence of reported depression symptoms was 14.3% (95% CI 10.9-18.3) 1 day prior to ELCS, 8.0% (95% CI 4.2-12.5) within 1 week, 8.7% (95% CI 4.2-13.8) at 10 weeks and 12.4% (95% CI 6.4-18.4) 1 year postpartum. Prevalence of reported anxiety symptoms was 27.3% (95% CI 22.5-32.4), 21.7% (95% CI 15.8-28.0), 25.3% (95% CI 18.5-32.7) and 35.1% (95% CI 26.3-44.2) at these same stages. Prenatal anxiety was not resolved after ELCS more than 1 year after delivery. Conclusions Women undergoing ELCS experience prolonged anxiety postpartum that merits focused clinical attention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available