4.8 Article

Activities of gyrase and topoisomerase IV on positively supercoiled DNA

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 16, Pages 9611-9624

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx649

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Veterans Administration Merit Review Award [I01 Bx002198]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [GM033944, AI81775]
  3. Intramural Research Program of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute at the National Institutes of Health [HL001056]
  4. National Science Foundation [DGE-0909667]
  5. NIH [GM033944]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although bacterial gyrase and topoisomerase IV have critical interactions with positively supercoiled DNA, little is known about the actions of these enzymes on overwound substrates. Therefore, the abilities of Bacillus anthracis and Escherichia coli gyrase and topoisomerase IV to relax and cleave positively supercoiled DNA were analyzed. Gyrase removed positive supercoils similar to 10-fold more rapidly and more processively than it introduced negative supercoils into relaxed DNA. In time-resolved singlemolecule measurements, gyrase relaxed overwound DNA with burst rates of similar to 100 supercoils per second (average burst size was 6.2 supercoils). Efficient positive supercoil removal required the GyrAbox, which is necessary for DNA wrapping. Topoisomerase IV also was able to distinguish DNA geometry during strand passage and relaxed positively supercoiled substrates similar to 3-fold faster than negatively supercoiledmolecules. Gyrase maintained lower levels of cleavage complexes with positively supercoiled (compared with negatively supercoiled) DNA, whereas topoisomerase IV generated similar levels with both substrates. Results indicate that gyrase is better suited than topoisomerase IV to safely remove positive supercoils that accumulate ahead of replication forks. They also suggest that the wrapping mechanism of gyrase may have evolved to promote rapid removal of positive supercoils, rather than induction of negative supercoils.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available