4.8 Article

Retrotransposons are specified as DNA replication origins in the gene-poor regions of Arabidopsis heterochromatin

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 14, Pages 8358-8368

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx524

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [BFU2012-34821, BIO2013-50098-EXP, BFU2015-68396-R/FEDER, BFU2009-11932, AGL2013-43244-R]
  2. Fundacion Ramon Areces

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genomic stability depends on faithful genome replication. This is achieved by the concerted activity of thousands of DNA replication origins (ORIs) scattered throughout the genome. The DNA and chromatin features determining ORI specification are not presently known. We have generated a high-resolution genome-wide map of 3230 ORIs in cultured Arabidopsis thaliana cells. Here, we focused on defining the features associated with ORIs in heterochromatin. In pericentromeric gene-poor domains ORIs associate almost exclusively with the retrotransposon class of transposable elements (TEs), in particular of the Gypsy family. ORI activity in retrotransposons occurs independently of TE expression and while maintaining high levels of H3K9me2 and H3K27me1, typical marks of repressed heterochromatin. ORI-TEs largely colocalize with chromatin signatures defining GC-rich heterochromatin. Importantly, TEs with active ORIs contain a local GC content higher than the TEs lacking them. Our results lead us to conclude that ORI colocalization with retrotransposons is determined by their transposition mechanism based on transcription, and a specific chromatin landscape. Our detailed analysis of ORIs responsible for heterochromatin replication has implications on the mechanisms of ORI specification in other multicellular organisms in which retrotransposons are major components of heterochromatin and of the entire genome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available