Journal
COGNITION
Volume 170, Issue -, Pages 179-189Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.019
Keywords
Automatic imitation; Mimicry; Taboo; Context; Social norm; Social priming
Categories
Funding
- Research Foundation Flanders [FWO14/ASP/050]
- Swiss National Science. Foundation [PZ00P1_168007]
- Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PZ00P1_168007] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
According to social reward theories, automatic imitation can be understood as a means to obtain positive social consequences. In line with this view, it has been shown that automatic imitation is modulated by contextual variables that constrain the positive outcomes of imitation. However, this work has largely neglected that many gestures have an inherent pro- or antisocial meaning. As a result of their meaning, antisocial gestures are considered taboo and should not be used in public. In three experiments, we show that automatic imitation of symbolic gestures is modulated by the social intent of these gestures. Experiment 1 (N = 37) revealed reduced automatic imitation of antisocial compared with prosocial gestures. Experiment 2 (N = 118) and Experiment 3 (N = 118) used a social priming procedure to show that this effect was stronger in a prosocial context than in an antisocial context. These findings were supported in a within-study meta-analysis using both frequentist and Bayesian statistics. Together, our results indicate that automatic imitation is regulated by internalized social norms that act as a stop signal when inappropriate actions are triggered.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available