4.5 Article

Overview of the JET results in support to ITER

Journal

NUCLEAR FUSION
Volume 57, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/aa5e28

Keywords

JET; plasma; fusion; ITER

Funding

  1. Euratom research and training programme [633053]
  2. EPSRC [EP/H02395X/1, EP/D062837/1, EP/H002189/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. STFC [ST/I000720/1, ST/P000320/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H02395X/1, EP/H002189/1, EP/D062837/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/P000320/1, ST/I000720/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 2014-2016 JET results are reviewed in the light of their significance for optimising the ITER research plan for the active and non-active operation. More than 60 h of plasma operation with ITER first wall materials successfully took place since its installation in 2011. New multi-machine scaling of the type I-ELM divertor energy flux density to ITER is supported by first principle modelling. ITER relevant disruption experiments and first principle modelling are reported with a set of three disruption mitigation valves mimicking the ITER setup. Insights of the L-H power threshold in Deuterium and Hydrogen are given, stressing the importance of the magnetic configurations and the recent measurements of fine-scale structures in the edge radial electric. Dimensionless scans of the core and pedestal confinement provide new information to elucidate the importance of the first wall material on the fusion performance. H-mode plasmas at ITER triangularity (H = 1 at beta(N) similar to 1.8 and n/n(GW) similar to 0.6) have been sustained at 2 MA during 5 s. The ITER neutronics codes have been validated on high performance experiments. Prospects for the coming D-T campaign and 14 MeV neutron calibration strategy are reviewed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available