4.3 Article

N-acetylmannosamine (ManNAc) supports the growth of Borrelia burgdorferi in the absence of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc)

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 365, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fny243

Keywords

Borrelia burgdorferi; N acetylglucosamine; N-acetylmannosamine; transcriptome; Lyme disease; carbohydrate utilization

Categories

Funding

  1. College of Arts and Sciences at the University of North Carolina Wilmington

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Borrelia burgdorferi, the causative agent of Lyme disease, lacks the ability to biosynthesize many essential nutrients de novo, including N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc). This amino sugar is required for cell wall synthesis, and is a component of the complex growth medium used for in vitro propagation. When cultured without free GlcNAc, B. burgdorferi cells exhibit a unique biphasic growth pattern. We hypothesized that genes involved in the GlcNAc starvation response would be differentially expressed when compared to cells cultured in complete medium, and investigated this using transcriptomics. Twenty-one genes were differentially regulated in wild-type and starvation-adapted cells cultured without GlcNAc compared to wild-type cells cultured with GlcNAc. Of those, three genes involved in carbohydrate utilization were upregulated: bbb04 (chbC) encoding a subunit of the chitobiose transporter, bb0629 (fruA-2) encoding a putative carbohydrate transporter and bb0644 (nanE) encoding a putative GlcNAc-6-phosphate-2-epimerase predicted to catalyze the conversion of N-acetylmannosamine-6-phosphate (ManNAc-6-P) to GlcNAc-6-P. Quantitative RT-PCR was used to confirm differential expression of select genes, and substitution of free GlcNAc with free ManNAc resulted in growth to high cell density, suggesting B. burgdorferi cells can utilize free ManNAc for cell wall synthesis and energy production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available