4.5 Article

Type of E-Cigarette Device Used Among Adolescents and Young Adults: Findings From a Pooled Analysis of Eight Studies of 2166 Vapers

Journal

NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 271-274

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntx069

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [P50CA180905, P50CA179546, P50CA180890, P50CA180906]
  2. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Tobacco Products (CTP)
  3. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) at the NIH [P50DA036128, P50DA036151]
  4. FDA CTP
  5. NIDA at the NIH [R01-DA033296]
  6. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P50CA179546, P50CA180890, P50CA180906, P50CA180905] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [P30ES007048] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [P50DA036151, P50DA036128] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: A recent study of adult smokers who vape found that disposable/cigalike electronic (e-)cigarette devices were more commonly used than later generation devices. However, whether these trends reflect patterns among adolescents and young adults, many of whom have limited or no history of combustible cigarette use, has not been studied. Methods: Participants were drawn from eight locally, regionally, and US nationally representative studies. Surveys took place between Fall 2014 and Spring 2016; participants were residents of California (3 studies), Texas (2 studies), Connecticut (1 study), or randomly selected from the US population (2 studies). Data were collected from middle and high school students (4 studies), young adults under 30 (3 studies), or a mixture (1 study) to assess type of e-cigarette device used among past-30 day e-cigarette users: disposable/cigalike, or later generation e-cigarette device. Results: Fewer than 15% of participants in each study reported primarily using a disposable/cigalike device in the past month (across all studies: 7.5%; 95% CI: 4.9%, 10.5%). The proportion using later generation devices ranged from 58% to 86% across studies; overall, 77.0% (95% CI: 70.5%, 82.9%) reported primary use of a later generation device. Combined, 13.2% (95% CI: 5.9%, 22.8%) reported don't know or were missing data. Conclusions: Among adolescent and young adult e-cigarette users, primary use of disposable/cigalike devices was rare. Future research should continue to evaluate the type of device used by adolescents and young adults, as these data may be relevant to regulatory oversight of e-cigarettes recently acquired by the Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products. Implications: In this pooled analysis of adolescent and young adult vapers, primary use of later generation e-cigarette devices was substantially more common than use of disposable/cigalike devices. The type of device predominantly used by adolescents and young adults has regulatory implications for policy to reduce adolescent use of e-cigarettes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available