4.5 Article

What Proportion of People Who Try One Cigarette Become Daily Smokers? A Meta-Analysis of Representative Surveys

Journal

NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages 1427-1433

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntx243

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The conversion rate from initial experimentation to daily smoking is a potentially important metric of smoking behavior, but estimates of it based on current representative data are lacking. Methods: The Global Health Data Exchange was searched for representative surveys conducted in English speaking, developed countries after the year 2000 that included questions about ever trying a cigarette and ever smoking daily. The initial search identified 2776 surveys that were further screened for language, location, year, sample size, survey structure, and representativeness. Forty-four surveys that passed the screening process were accessed, and their codebooks were examined to see whether the two questions of interest were included. Eight datasets allowed extraction or estimation of relevant information. Survey quality was assessed with regards to response rates, sampling methods, and data collection procedures. PRISMA guidelines were followed, with explicit rules for approaching derived variables and skip patterns. Proportions were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. Results: The eight surveys used representative samples of the general adult population. Response rates varied from 45% to 88%. Survey methods were on par with the best practice in this field. Altogether, 216 314 respondents were included of whom 60.3% (95% CI = 51.3 to 69.3) ever tried a cigarette. Among them, 68.9% (95% CI = 60.9 to 76.9%) progressed to daily smoking. Conclusions: Over two-thirds of people who try one cigarette become, at least temporarily, daily smokers. The finding provides strong support for the current efforts to reduce cigarette experimentation among adolescents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available