4.7 Article

Optical Counterparts of Ultraluminous X-Ray Sources NGC 4559 X-10 and NGC 4395 ULX-1

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 854, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaaa6c

Keywords

accretion, accretion disks; X-rays: binaries; X-rays: individual (NGC 4559 X-10, NGC 4395 ULX-1)

Funding

  1. NASA [NAS 5-26555]
  2. Russian RFBR [16-32-00210, 16-02-00567]
  3. Russian Government Program of Competitive Growth of KFU
  4. Russian Science Foundation [N 14-50-00043]
  5. Russian Science Foundation [14-50-00043] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the optical counterparts of ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs) NGC 4559 X-10 and NGC 4395 ULX-1. Their absolute magnitudes, after taking reddening into account, are M-V approximate to -5.3 and M-V approximate to -6.2, respectively. The spectral energy distribution (SED) of the NGC 4559 X-10 counterpart is well fitted by a spectrum of an A-type star, whereas NGC 4395 ULX-1 has a blue power-law spectrum. Optical spectroscopy of NGC 4395 ULX-1 has shown a broad He II lambda 4686 emission, which puts this object in line with all of the other spectrally studied ULXs. Analyzing the absolute magnitudes of 16 well-studied ULX counterparts, we find that the intrinsically fainter counterparts with M-V greater than or similar to -5.5 have, on average, blackbody-like or power-law SEDs. In other ULX counterparts with M-V less than or similar to -5.5, we may observe a power-law-like SED; the only one donor is in NGC 7793 P13 (the ULX-pulsar). One may suggest that as the original accretion rate decreases (but nevertheless remains supercritical), the optical luminosity of the wind becomes lower and the donor star might dominate. Using the Swift archival X-ray data for NGC 4395 ULX-1, we have found a period of 62.8 +/- 2.3 days. The X-ray phase curve of the source is very similar to the precession curve of SS 433.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available