4.5 Article

Availability and Use of Cheap Tobacco in the United Kingdom 2002-2014: Findings From the International Tobacco Control Project

Journal

NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 714-724

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntx108

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research Public Health Research [13/43/58]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [57897, 79551, 115016]
  3. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation [045734]
  4. Cancer Research U.K. [C312/A326, C312/A6465, C312/A11039, C312/A11943]
  5. Commonwealth Department of Health and Aging, Canadian Tobacco Control Research Initiative [014578]
  6. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [265903, 450110, APP1005922]
  7. U.S. National Cancer Institute [P50 CA111236, R01 CA100362]
  8. Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
  9. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G007489/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Medical Research Council [MR/K023195/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. National Institute for Health Research [13/43/58] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Raising tobacco prices is the most effective population-level intervention for reducing smoking, but this is undermined by the availability of cheap tobacco. This study monitors trends in cheap tobacco use among adult smokers in the United Kingdom between 2002 and 2014 via changes in product type, purchase source, and prices paid. Methods: Weighted data from 10 waves of the International Tobacco Control policy evaluation study were used. This is a longitudinal cohort study of adult smokers with replenishment; 6169 participants provided 15 812 responses. Analyses contrasted (1) product type: roll-your-own (RYO) tobacco, factory-made packs (FM-P), and factory-made cartons (FM-C); (2) purchase source: UK store-based sources (e.g., supermarkets and convenience stores) with non-UK/nonstore sources representing tax avoidance/evasion (e.g., outside the UK, duty free, and informal sellers); and (3) prices paid (inflation-adjusted to 2014 values). Generalized estimating equations tested linear changes over time. Results: (1) RYO use increased significantly over time as FM decreased. (2) UK store-based sources constituted approximately 80% of purchases over time, with no significant increases in tax avoidance/evasion. (3) Median RYO prices were less than half that of FM, with FM-C cheaper than FM-P. Non-UK/nonstore sources were cheapest. Price increases of all three product types from UK store-based sources from 2002 to 2014 were statistically significant but not substantial. Wide (and increasing for FM-P) price ranges meant each product type could be purchased in 2014 at prices below their 2002 medians from UK store-based sources. Conclusions: Options exist driving UK smokers to minimize their tobacco expenditure; smokers do so largely by purchasing cheap tobacco products from UK stores.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available