3.8 Proceedings Paper

Progress in the Construction and Testing of the Tianlai Radio Interferometers

Publisher

SPIE-INT SOC OPTICAL ENGINEERING
DOI: 10.1117/12.2313031

Keywords

radio interferometry; cosmology; neutral hydrogen; intensity-mapping

Funding

  1. NSF [AST-1616554]
  2. MOST [2016YFE0100300, 2012AA121701]
  3. NSFC [U1501501, 11473044, 11633004]
  4. CAS [QYZDJ-SSW-SLH017]
  5. CNRS (IN2P3 INSU)
  6. Observatoire de Paris
  7. Irfu/CEA
  8. Fermi Research Alliance, LLC (FRA) [DE-AC02-07CH11359]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Tianlai Pathfinder is designed to demonstrate the feasibility of using wide field of view radio interferometers to map the density of neutral hydrogen in the Universe after the Epoch of Reionizaton. This approach, called 21 cm intensity-mapping, promises an inexpensive means for surveying the large-scale structure of the cosmos. The Tianlai Pathfinder presently consists of an array of three, 15 m x 40 m cylinder telescopes and an array of sixteen, 6 m diameter dish antennas located in a radio-quiet part of western China. The two types of arrays were chosen to determine the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. The primary goal of the Pathfinder is to make 3D maps by surveying neutral hydrogen over large areas of the sky in two different redshift ranges: first at 1.03 > z > 0.78 (700 - 800 MHz) and later at 0.21 > z > 0.12 (1170 - 1270 MHz). The most significant challenge to 21 cm intensity-mapping is the removal of strong foreground radiation that dwarfs the cosmological signal. It requires exquisite knowledge of the instrumental response, i.e. calibration. In this paper we provide an overview of the status of the Pathfinder and discuss the details of some of the analysis that we have carried out to measure the beam function of both arrays. We compare electromagnetic simulations of the arrays to measurements, discuss measurements of the gain and phase stability of the instrument, and provide a brief overview of the data processing pipeline.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available