3.8 Proceedings Paper

Optimizing fluorescently-tethered Hsp90 inhibitor dose for maximal specific uptake by breast tumors

Publisher

SPIE-INT SOC OPTICAL ENGINEERING
DOI: 10.1117/12.2285210

Keywords

Fluorescence imaging; microscopy; breast cancer imaging; translational research; Hsp90; molecular imaging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite improvements in surgical resection, 20-40% of patients undergoing breast conserving surgery require at least one additional re-excision. Leveraging the unique surface expression of heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90), a chaperone protein involved in several key hallmarks of cancer, in breast cancer provides an exciting opportunity to identify residual disease during surgery. We developed a completely non-destructive strategy using HS-27, a fluorescently-tethered Hsp90 inhibitor, to assay surface Hsp90 expression on intact tissue specimens using a fluorescence microendoscope with a field of view of 750 mu m and subcellular resolution of 4 mu m. HS-27 consists of an FDA approved Hsp90 inhibitor tethered to fluorescein isothiocyanate (EX 488nm, EM 525nm). Here, we optimized ex vivo HS-27 administration in pre-clinical breast cancer models and validated our approach on 21 patients undergoing standard of care ultrasound guided core needle biopsy. HS-27 administration time was fixed at 1-minute to minimize imaging impact on clinical workflow. HS-27 and HS-217 (non-specific control) doses were modulated from 1 mu M up to 100 mu M to identify the dose maximizing the ratio of specific uptake (HS-27 fluorescence) to non-specific uptake (HS-217 fluorescence). The specificity ratio was maximized at 100 mu M and was significantly greater than all other doses (p<0.05). We applied our optimized imaging protocol to clinical samples and demonstrated significantly greater uptake of HS-27 by tumor than non-tumor tissue (p<0.05). The ubiquitous nature of HS-27 binding to all subtypes of breast cancer makes this technology attractive for assessing tumor margins, as one agent can be used for all subtypes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available