4.6 Article

CrowdCurio: an online crowdsourcing platform to facilitate climate change studies using herbarium specimens

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 215, Issue 1, Pages 479-488

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14535

Keywords

citizen science; flowering; fruiting; phenological sensitivity; phenology; phenophase

Categories

Funding

  1. New England Vascular Plant Project [NSF-DBI:EF1208835]
  2. NSERC [RGPIN-2015-04543]
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1208835] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phenology is a key aspect of plant success. Recent research has demonstrated that herbarium specimens can provide important information on plant phenology. Massive digitization efforts have the potential to greatly expand herbarium-based phenological research, but also pose a serious challenge regarding efficient data collection. Here, we introduce CrowdCurio, a crowdsourcing tool for the collection of phenological data from herbarium specimens. We test its utility by having workers collect phenological data (number of flower buds, open flowers and fruits) from specimens of two common New England (USA) species: Chelidonium majus and Vaccinium angustifolium. We assess the reliability of using nonexpert workers (i.e. Amazon Mechanical Turk) against expert workers. We also use these data to estimate the phenological sensitivity to temperature for both species across multiple phenophases. We found no difference in the data quality of nonexperts and experts. Nonexperts, however, were a more efficient way of collecting more data at lower cost. We also found that phenological sensitivity varied across both species and phenophases. Our study demonstrates the utility of CrowdCurio as a crowdsourcing tool for the collection of phenological data from herbarium specimens. Furthermore, our results highlight the insight gained from collecting large amounts of phenological data to estimate multiple phenophases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available