4.6 Article

UNBRANCHED3 regulates branching by modulating cytokinin biosynthesis and signaling in maize and rice

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 214, Issue 2, Pages 721-733

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14391

Keywords

cytokinin; inflorescence meristem; kernel row number; panicle branch; tiller; UNBRANCHED3

Categories

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2014CB138203]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91335110, 31271738]
  3. CAS Key Technology Talent Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

UNBRANCHED3 (UB3), a member of the SQUAMOSA promoter binding protein-like (SPL) gene family, regulates kernel row number by negatively modulating the size of the inflorescence meristem in maize. However, the regulatory pathway by which UB3 mediates branching remains unknown. We introduced the UB3 into rice and maize to reveal its effects in the two crop plants, respectively. Furthermore, we performed transcriptome sequencing and protein-DNA binding assay to elucidate the regulatory pathway of UB3. We found that UB3 could bind and regulate the promoters of LONELY GUY1 (LOG1) and Type-A response regulators (ARRs), which participate in cytokinin biosynthesis and signaling. Overexpression of exogenous UB3 in rice (Oryza sativa) dramatically suppressed tillering and panicle branching as a result of a greater decrease in the amount of active cytokinin. By contrast, moderate expression of UB3 suppressed tillering slightly, but promoted panicle branching by cooperating with SPL genes, resulting in a higher grain number per panicle in rice. In maize (Zea mays) ub3 mutant with an increased kernel row number, UB3 showed a low expression but cytokinin biosynthesis-related genes were up-regulated and degradation-related genes were down-regulated. These results suggest that UB3 regulates vegetative and reproductive branching by modulating cytokinin biosynthesis and signaling in maize and rice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available