4.6 Article

Insights on the evolutionary origin of Detarioideae, a clade of ecologically dominant tropical African trees

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 214, Issue 4, Pages 1722-1735

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14523

Keywords

biogeography; biome evolution; diversification rates; Fabaceae; mono-dominant forests; niche conservatism; tropical forests

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. European Union [659152]
  3. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [659152] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

African tropical forests are generally considered less diverse than their Neotropical and Asian counterparts. By contrast, the Detarioideae is much more diverse in Africa than in South America and Asia. To better understand the evolution of this contrasting diversity pattern, we investigated the biogeographical and ecological origin of this subfamily, testing whether they originated in dry biomes surrounding the Tethys Seaway as currently hypothesized for many groups of Leguminosae. We constructed the largest time-calibrated phylogeny for the subfamily to date, reconstructed ancestral states for geography and biome/habitat, estimated diversification and extinction rates, and evaluated biome/habitat and geographic shifts in Detarioideae. The ancestral habitat of Detarioideae is postulated to be a primary forest (terra firme) originated in Africa-South America, in the early Palaeocene, after which several biome/habitat and geographic shifts occurred. The origin of Detarioideae is older than previous estimates, which postulated a dry (succulent) biome origin according to the Tethys Seaway hypothesis, and instead we reveal a post Gondwana and terra firme origin for this early branching clade of legumes. Detarioideae include some of the most dominant trees in evergreen forests and have likely played a pivotal role in shaping continental African forest diversity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available