4.6 Review

Reproductive modification in forest plantations: impacts on biodiversity and society

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 213, Issue 3, Pages 1000-1021

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14374

Keywords

biotechnology; genetic engineering; genetic modification; genetically modified organism; landscape; pollinator; risk perception; seed

Categories

Funding

  1. Biotechnology Risk Assessment Grant Program (USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture and the Agricultural Research Service) [2011-68005-30407, USDA-NIFA-2012-67009-20090]
  2. Agriculture Food and Research Initiative grant [AFRI-2009-04457, AFRI-2015-67019-23178]
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh [1238305] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic engineering (GE) can be used to improve forest plantation productivity and tolerance of biotic and abiotic stresses. However, gene flow from GE forest plantations is a large source of ecological, social and legal controversy. The use of genetic technologies to mitigate or prevent gene flow has been discussed widely and should be technically feasible in a variety of plantation taxa. However, potential ecological effects of such modifications, and their social acceptability, are not well understood. Focusing on Eucalyptus, Pinus, Populus and Pseudotsuga - genera that represent diverse modes of pollination and seed dispersal - we conducted in-depth reviews of ecological processes associated with reproductive tissues. We also explored potential impacts of various forms of reproductive modification at stand and landscape levels, and means for mitigating impacts. We found little research on potential reactions by the public and other stakeholders to reproductive modification in forest plantations. However, there is considerable research on related areas that suggest key dimensions of concern and support. We provide detailed suggestions for research to understand the biological and social dimensions of containment technologies, and consider the role of regulatory and market restrictions that obstruct necessary ecological and genetic research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available