4.6 Article

Comparative plastome genomics and phylogenomics of Brachypodium: flowering time signatures, introgression and recombination in recently diverged ecotypes

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 218, Issue 4, Pages 1631-1644

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14926

Keywords

Brachypodium distachyon-B. stacei-B. hybridum; comparative ptDNA genomics; grass phylogenomics; intraspecific genealogy; nested dating analysis; plastid introgression and recombination

Categories

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity (Mineco) [CGL2012-39953-C02-01, CSIC13-4E-2490, CGL2016-79790-P]
  2. Fundacion ARAID
  3. Spanish Mineco PhD fellowships
  4. Bioflora grant by Spanish Aragon Government
  5. European Social Fund
  6. Office of Science of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Few pan-genomic studies have been conducted in plants, and none of them have focused on the intraspecific diversity and evolution of their plastid genomes. We address this issue in Brachypodium distachyon and its close relatives B. stacei and B. hybridum, for which a large genomic data set has been compiled. We analyze inter- and intraspecific plastid comparative genomics and phylogenomic relationships within a familywide framework. Major indel differences were detected between Brachypodium plastomes. Within B. distachyon, we detected two main lineages, a mostly Extremely Delayed Flowering (EDF+) clade and a mostly Spanish (S+) - Turkish (T+) clade, plus nine chloroplast capture and two plastid DNA (ptDNA) introgression and micro-recombination events. Early Oligocene (30.9 million yr ago (Ma)) and Late Miocene (10.1 Ma) divergence times were inferred for the respective stem and crown nodes of Brachypodium and a very recent Mid-Pleistocene (0.9 Ma) time for the B. distachyon split. Flowering time variation is a main factor driving rapid intraspecific divergence in B. distachyon, although it is counterbalanced by repeated introgression between previously isolated lineages. Swapping of plastomes between the three different genomic groups, EDF+, T+, S+, probably resulted from random backcrossing followed by stabilization through selection pressure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available