4.6 Article

Probing CP violation with non-unitary mixing in long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments: DUNE as a case study

Journal

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/aa79ec

Keywords

neutrino masses and mixings; neutrino oscillations; neutrino interactions

Funding

  1. Multidark [CSD2009-00064]
  2. MINECO [SEV-2014-0398]
  3. Generalitat Valenciana [PROMETEOII/2014/084]
  4. Ayuda para Proyectos Emergentes, Generalitat Valenciana [GV2016-142]
  5. MINECO
  6. CONACyT (Mexico) [166639]
  7. URA
  8. US Department Of Energy [DE-SC0013632, DE-SC0009973]
  9. [FPA2014-58183-P]
  10. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0013632, DE-SC0009973] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When neutrino masses arise from the exchange of neutral heavy leptons, as in most seesaw schemes, the effective lepton mixing matrix N describing neutrino propagation is non-unitary, hence neutrinos are not exactly orthonormal. New CP violation phases appear in N that could be confused with the standard phase delta(CP) characterizing the three neutrino paradigm. We study the potential of the long-baseline neutrino experiment DUNE in probing CP violation induced by the standard CP phase in the presence of non-unitarity. In order to accomplish this we develop our previous formalism, so as to take into account the neutrino interactions with the medium, important in long baseline experiments such as DUNE. We find that the expected CP sensitivity of DUNE is somewhat degraded with respect to that characterizing the standard unitary case. However the effect is weaker than might have been expected thanks mainly to the wide neutrino beam. We also investigate the sensitivity of DUNE to the parameters characterizing non-unitarity. In this case we find that there is no improvement expected with respect to the current situation, unless the near detector setup is revamped.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available