4.6 Article

Zeeman deceleration beyond periodic phase space stability

Journal

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/aa7ef5

Keywords

Zeeman deceleration; evolutionary strategy; decelerator sequence optimisation

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/N004647/1, EP/N032950/1, 1512257]
  2. Marie Curie ITN scheme (COMIQ) [FP7-GA-607491]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1512257, EP/N032950/1, EP/N004647/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/N004647/1, EP/N032950/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In Zeeman deceleration, time-varying spatially inhomogeneous magnetic fields are used to create packets of translationally cold, quantum-state-selected paramagnetic particles with a tuneable forward velocity, which are ideal for cold reaction dynamics studies. Here, the covariance matrix adaptation evolutionary strategy is adopted in order to optimise deceleration switching sequences for the operation of a Zeeman decelerator. Using the optimised sequences, a 40% increase in the number of decelerated particles is observed compared to standard sequences for the same final velocity, imposing the same experimental boundary conditions. Furthermore, we demonstrate that it is possible to remove up to 98% of the initial kinetic energy of particles in the incoming beam, compared to the removal of a maximum of 83% of kinetic energy with standard sequences. Three-dimensional particle trajectory simulations are employed to reproduce the experimental results and to investigate differences in the deceleration mechanism adopted by standard and optimised sequences. It is experimentally verified that the optimal solution uncovered by the evolutionary algorithm is not merely a local optimisation of the experimental parameters-it is a novel mode of operation that goes beyond the standard periodic phase stability approach typically adopted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available