3.9 Article

Trade restriction rationale for food safety implementation: Evidence from Southeast Asian Countries

Journal

COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2018.1553278

Keywords

international trade; protectionism; NTMs; MRLs; food safety; political economy; Southeast Asian countries

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Economics, Kasetsart University [9/2557]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In response to the widespread use of food safety standards as a tool for restricting international trade, this study attempts to answer whether Southeast Asian countries follow this protectionist trend or not. It employs the political economy framework and focuses on the case of the implementation of maximum residue limits (MRLs) on 113 food products which these countries import from their trading partners. The study utilizes the logit model and marginal effects to find the determinants of MRLs implementation. The estimation includes both the seven-countries and the single-country models. As for the former, the result indicates that Southeast Asian countries simultaneously use MRLs both to raise people's quality of life via food safety implementation and to protect import-competing producers. On the other hand, each single-country model provides a clearer picture of the reasons for its enforcement of MRLs; one is with trade restriction motive, while the others are with welfare improving purpose.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available