4.6 Article

Synthesis and electrochemical evaluation of the PANI/δ-MnO2 electrode for high performing asymmetric supercapacitors

Journal

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
Volume 41, Issue 14, Pages 6574-6584

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7nj00679a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Research and Innovation Department of Universiti Malaysia Pahang through UMP Internal Grants [RDU 150354, GRS 130317]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comprehensive analysis of the effect of in situ polymerization of polyaniline (PANI) on hydrothermally synthesized Birnessite-type MnO2 (delta-MnO2) flowers on the structural, surface, morphological, and electrochemical properties is presented in this article. The PANI-MnO2 electrodes showed B170% higher specific capacitance than pure MnO2; the factors contributing to this enhancement are systematically investigated and discussed. The PANI modification enabled the inactive surface of the MnO2 to be electrochemically active and reduced the characteristic resistances and charge relaxation time. Furthermore, the PANI modification improved the composite conductivity and resulted in (i) reduction of surface pseudo-capacitance from 87% (MnO2) to 54% (PANI-MnO2) and (ii) improvement of active charge contribution from 42% (MnO2) to 46% (PANI-MnO2). The mechanism of these changes is discussed. Furthermore, asymmetric (PANI-MnO2//AC and PANI-MnO2//OMC) and symmetric (AC//AC and OMC//OMC) (where AC is activated carbon and OMC is mesoporous carbon) supercapacitors are fabricated in coin cell casing and their charge storage properties are evaluated. Impressive increase in energy storage is observed; however, their properties varied according to the porosity of the carbon electrode. Results from this study provide a better understanding of the charge storage behaviour of polymer coated metal oxide electrodes with a varied choice of carbons in asymmetric supercapacitors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available