4.6 Review

Advanced state estimation for navigation of automated vehicles

Journal

ANNUAL REVIEWS IN CONTROL
Volume 46, Issue -, Pages 181-195

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.09.002

Keywords

State estimation; Inertial navigation; Satellite-Based navigation; Intelligent vehicles; Kalman filtering; Aerospace systems; Marine systems; Railway systems

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy [50NA1510, 50NA1610]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For the emerging topic of automated and autonomous vehicles in all major sectors, reliable and accurate state estimation for navigation of these vehicles becomes increasingly important. Inertial navigation, aided with measurements from global navigation satellite systems (GNSS), allows high-rate and low-cost estimation of position, velocity and orientation in real-time applications. As the available satellite constellations for navigation are modernized and their number is rising, usage of multi-constellation, dual frequency and integration of correction data lead to increased accuracy, especially in areas with partial shadowing. Different coupling methods, e.g. tightly- and loosely-coupled integrations, were developed to combine inertial and GNSS measurements. Also different error estimation filters were applied to the navigation problem, and evaluated against each other. For the typical navigation task, the objective is to choose a suitable algorithm for the specific requirements of the target application, and deploy it using an appropriate implementation strategy. This contribution gives a short introduction into the field of aided inertial navigation techniques, provides useful hints for implementation, and evaluates their performance in experiments using two different railway vehicles, an autonomous maritime vessel, and an unmanned aerial quadrotor. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available