4.5 Article

EXTRACTING SPARSE HIGH-DIMENSIONAL DYNAMICS FROM LIMITED DATA

Journal

SIAM JOURNAL ON APPLIED MATHEMATICS
Volume 78, Issue 6, Pages 3279-3295

Publisher

SIAM PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.1137/18M116798X

Keywords

high-dimensional dynamical systems; sparse optimization; model selection; exact recovery; undersampled data; chaos

Funding

  1. AFOSR [FA-95550-17-1-0125]
  2. NSERC [RGPIN-2018-06135]
  3. NSF CAREER grant [1255631]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1255631] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extracting governing equations from dynamic data is an essential task in model selection and parameter estimation. The form of the governing equation is rarely known a priori; however, based on the sparsity-of-effect principle one may assume that the number of candidate functions needed to represent the dynamics is very small. In this work, we leverage the sparse structure of the governing equations along with recent results from random sampling theory to develop methods for selecting dynamical systems from undersampled data. In particular, we detail three sampling strategies that lead to the exact recovery of first-order dynamical systems when we are given fewer samples than unknowns. The first method makes no assumptions on the behavior of the data, and requires a certain number of random initial samples. The second method utilizes the structure of the governing equation to limit the number of random initializations needed. The third method leverages chaotic behavior in the data to construct a nearly deterministic sampling strategy. Using results from compressive sensing, we show that the strategies lead to exact recovery, which is stable to the sparse structure of the governing equations and robust to noise in the estimation of the velocity. Computational results validate each of the sampling strategies and highlight potential applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available