4.8 Article

Mepolizumab or Placebo for Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 376, Issue 20, Pages 1921-1932

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1702079

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. GlaxoSmithKline [115921]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health [U01 AI097073]
  3. Division of Intramural Research, NIAID, National Institutes of Health
  4. Astra-Zeneca
  5. Boston Scientific
  6. Novartis
  7. Vectura Group
  8. Sunovion
  9. Regeneron
  10. Ambit BioScience
  11. Meda Pharmaceuticals
  12. Mylan
  13. GliaCure
  14. Tunitas Therapeutics
  15. Genentech
  16. Theravance Bio-pharma
  17. Neurotronics
  18. Boehringer Ingelheim
  19. Sanofi
  20. Sentien Biotechnologies
  21. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
  22. Ambrx
  23. AstraZeneca
  24. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  25. ChemoCentryx
  26. Genentech/Roche
  27. Celgene
  28. MedImmune/AstraZeneca
  29. Boston Pharmaceuticals
  30. GlaxoSmithKline
  31. InflaRx
  32. Seattle Genetics
  33. Roche
  34. Chugai Pharmaceuticals
  35. Eli Lilly
  36. SmithKline
  37. Glaxo-Smith-Kline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis is an eosinophilic vasculitis. Mepolizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, reduces blood eosinophil counts and may have value in the treatment of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. METHODS In this multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned participants with relapsing or refractory eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis who had received treatment for at least 4 weeks and were taking a stable prednisolone or prednisone dose to receive 300 mg of mepolizumab or placebo, administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks, plus standard care, for 52 weeks. The two primary end points were the accrued weeks of remission over a 52-week period, according to categorical quantification, and the proportion of participants in remission at both week 36 and week 48. Secondary end points included the time to first relapse and the average daily glucocorticoid dose (during weeks 48 through 52). The annualized relapse rate and safety were assessed. RESULTS A total of 136 participants underwent randomization, with 68 participants assigned to receive mepolizumab and 68 to receive placebo. Mepolizumab treatment led to significantly more accrued weeks of remission than placebo (28% vs. 3% of the participants had >= 24 weeks of accrued remission; odds ratio, 5.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.68 to 13.03; P<0.001) and a higher percentage of participants in remission at both week 36 and week 48 (32% vs. 3%; odds ratio, 16.74; 95% CI, 3.61 to 77.56; P<0.001). Remission did not occur in 47% of the participants in the mepolizumab group versus 81% of those in the placebo group. The annualized relapse rate was 1.14 in the mepolizumab group, as compared with 2.27 in the placebo group (rate ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.70; P<0.001). A total of 44% of the participants in the mepolizumab group, as compared with 7% of those in the placebo group, had an average daily dose of prednisolone or prednisone of 4.0 mg or less per day during weeks 48 through 52 (odds ratio, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.41; P<0.001). The safety profile of mepolizumab was similar to that observed in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS In participants with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, mepolizumab resulted in significantly more weeks in remission and a higher proportion of participants in remission than did placebo, thus allowing for reduced glucocorticoid use. Even so, only approximately half the participants treated with mepolizumab had protocol-defined remission. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02020889.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available