4.6 Article

Shadow prices of direct and overall carbon emissions in China's construction industry: A parametric directional distance function-based sensitive estimation

Journal

STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS
Volume 47, Issue -, Pages 180-193

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2018.08.006

Keywords

Abatement cost; Building material industry; Construction industry; Shadow price

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71871022, 71471018, 71521002, 71828401]
  2. Social Science Foundation of Beijing [16JDGLB013]
  3. Joint Development Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education
  4. Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation [161076]
  5. National Key RD Program [2016YFA0602603]
  6. International Clean Energy Talent Program of Chinese Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Construction industry, together with building materials industries supplying it, is one of China's largest emitters of CO2. Structural change in construction industry has been promoted to mitigate CO2. This paper estimates CO2 shadow price of construction industry and its supporting materials industries in China so as to help them to mitigate CO2 cost-effectively. A parametric directional distance function model, taking into account all possible directional vectors, is applied to address issues regarding arbitrary selection of direction that will affect estimation of shadow price. Results show that there is larger potential for CO2 reduction in supporting material industries than in construction industry itself and shadow price of overall CO2 is much lower than that of direct CO2. The existence of enlarging heterogeneity in shadow prices among different regions provides strong support for introducing a national carbon trading market, thereby helping construction industry and building materials industries to reduce their abatement costs. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available