4.4 Article

Informal recycling and social preferences: Evidence from household survey data in Vietnam

Journal

RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages 109-124

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2018.08.001

Keywords

Altruism; Household recycling; Inequality aversion; Informal sector; Private provision of a public good; Solid waste

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [26870109]
  2. Nagoya City University
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26870109] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the association between social preferences and recycling behavior in a developing country. A conceptual framework that modifies the impure altruism model with heterogeneous preferences and further incorporates the impure public good model is presented to study informal recycling behaviors. Based on survey data collected from 755 households in Hanoi, Vietnam, we find that the majority of sample households recycle all the recyclable materials they consume even though such recycling is not obligatory. Half the recycling households sell their recyclables to informal junk buyers, whereas the other half provide recyclables without monetary compensation. Our finding of voluntary recycling implies that a certain proportion of households have a positive marginal willingness to pay for an increase in the environmental public good. The results of the regression analyses show that recycling behavior is associated with altruism, as measured by a modified version of the self-report altruism scale. Among high-income households, recycling behavior is associated with inequality aversion, as elicited from a hypothetical game. These findings suggest that social preferences are important determinants of the private provision of public goods through the informal sector in a developing country. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available