4.6 Article

The Role of Extent of Resection in IDH1 Wild-Type or Mutant Low-Grade Gliomas

Journal

NEUROSURGERY
Volume 82, Issue 6, Pages 808-814

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyx265

Keywords

Extent of resection; Low-grade glioma; WHO grade II glioma; IDH1 mutation

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P30 CA008748]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Maximizing extent of resection (EOR) improves outcomes in adults with World Health Organization (WHO) grade II low-grade gliomas (LGG). However, recent studies demonstrate that LGGs bearing a mutation in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) gene are a distinct molecular and clinical entity. It remains unclear whether maximizing EOR confers an equivalent clinical benefit in IDH mutated (mtIDH) and IDH wild-type (wtIDH) LGGs. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of EOR on malignant progression-free survival (MPFS) and overall survival (OS) in mtIDH and wtIDH LGGs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 74 patients with WHO grade II gliomas and known IDH mutational status undergoing resection at a single institution. EOR was assessed with quantitative 3-dimensional volumetric analysis. The effect of predictor variables on MPFS and OS was analyzed with Cox regression models and the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Fifty-two (70%) mtIDH patients and 22 (30%) wtIDH patients were included. Median preoperative tumor volume was 37.4 cm(3); median EOR of 57.6% was achieved. Univariate Cox regression analysis confirmed EOR as a prognostic factor for the entire cohort. However, stratifying by IDH status demonstrates that greater EOR independently prolonged MPFS and OS for wtIDH patients (hazard ratio [HR]=0.002 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.000-0.074] and HR=0.001 [95% CI 0.00-0.108], respectively), but not for mtIDH patients (HR=0.84 [95% CI 0.17-4.13] and HR=2.99 [95% CI 0.15-61.66], respectively). CONCLUSION: Increasing EOR confers oncologic and survival benefits in IDH1 wtLGGs, but the impact on IDH1 mtLGGs requires further study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available