4.1 Article

Antioxidant capacity, polyphenol content and contribution to dietary intake of 52 fruits sold in Spain

Journal

CYTA-JOURNAL OF FOOD
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 1131-1138

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19476337.2018.1517828

Keywords

FRAP; ABTS; DPPH; total polyphenols; fruits; Spain

Funding

  1. Government of Spain [FPU16/02536]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and total polyphenol content (TPC) of 52 fruits sold in Spain were evaluated by FRAP, ABTS, DPPH and Folin-Ciocalteu. For berries, TAC was 9, 17 and 31 times greater than for oranges, bananas and apples, respectively. Consumption of unpeeled fruit increases TAC and TPC by 2.4 times. Oranges contribute most to TAC and TPC (33% and 32% respectively) in the Spanish diet. Oranges, strawberries, tangerines, grapes and bananas account for 76% of the TAC of fruits consumed in Spain. The consumption of fruit in Spain has remained stable for the last eight years, but falls below WHO recommendations for daily intake. Greater consumption of fruits is recommended, to increase TAC and TPC and to reduce the risk of developing chronic disease. RESUMENLa capacidad antioxidante total (CAT) y el contenido total de polifenoles (PT) de 52 frutas adquiridas en Espana se evaluaron por FRAP, ABTS, DPPH y Folin-Ciocalteu. Las bayas poseian una CAT de 9, 17 y 31 veces mayor que las naranjas, platanos y manzanas, respectivamente. El consumo de fruta sin pelar aumenta la CAT y PT en 2,4 veces. Las naranjas son las que mas contribuyen a CAT y PT (33% y 32% respectivamente) en la dieta espanola, si anadimos fresas, mandarinas, uvas y platanos esta sube al 76%. El consumo de fruta en Espana se ha mantenido estable durante los ultimos ocho anos, pero esta por debajo de las recomendaciones de la OMS para la ingesta diaria. Se recomienda un mayor consumo de frutas, para aumentar CAT y PT y asi reducir el riesgo de desarrollar enfermedades cronicas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available