4.7 Article

Analysis the optimum inlet air temperature for controlling homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) engine

Journal

ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages 2209-2214

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2017.08.011

Keywords

Homogeneous charge compression ignition engines; Inlet air temperature; Diesel fuelled; Emission reduction; Improve engine output

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Homogeneous charge compression ignition engine is promising replacement for conventional CI diesel engine with lower oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and smoke emissions and improves the thermal efficiency with consume less amount of fuel. In general, HCCI engine operates with lean air/fuel charge for all operating condition, and it makes the HCCI combustion more complex and difficult to control the start of ignition point. The inlet air temperature is the primary parameter for controlling the HCCI combustion. In this study, the HCCI engine was operated at different inlet air temperatures as 90 degrees C, 100 degrees C, 110 degrees C, 120 degrees C, 130 degrees C, 140 degrees C and 150 degrees C respectively. From this study, it was observed that the level of NOx emission increased with increasing the inlet air temperature and smoke emission was reduced with increasing the inlet charge temperature. The inlet air temperature about 120 degrees C showed maximum reduction of smoke emission about 15HSU at 60% load. Similarly, CO and HC were reduced with increasing the inlet air temperature. The specific fuel consumption of HCCI mode engine decreased with increasing the inlet air temperature and the power output of the engine increased with increasing the suction air temperature. (C) 2017 Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available