4.7 Review

Cognitive flexibility in neurological disorders: Cognitive components and event-related potentials

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 83, Issue -, Pages 496-507

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.09.011

Keywords

Cognitive flexibility; Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST); Set shifting; Rule inference; Parkinson's disease; Primary dystonia; Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Event-related potentials

Funding

  1. German National Academic Foundation
  2. KU Leuven Internal Funds
  3. FWO
  4. European Union's Horizon research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [665501]
  5. Petermax-Muller-Stiftung, Hannover, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Performance deficits on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) in patients with prefrontal cortex (PFC) lesions are traditionally interpreted as evidence for a role of the PFC in cognitive flexibility. However, WCST deficits do not occur exclusively after PFC lesions, but also in various neurological and psychiatric disorders. We propose a multi-component approach that can accommodate this pattern of omnipresent WCST deficits: the WCST is not a pure test of cognitive flexibility, but relies on the effective functioning of multiple dissociable cognitive components. Our review of recent efforts to decompose WCST performance deficits supports this view by revealing that WCST deficits in different neurological disorders can be attributed to alterations in different components. Frontoparietal changes underlying impaired set shifting seem to give rise to WCST deficits in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, whereas the WCST deficits associated with primary dystonia and Parkinson's disease are rather related to frontostriatal changes underlying deficient rule inference. Clinical implications of these findings and of a multi-component view of WCST performance are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available