4.7 Article

Dopamine Receptor-Specific Contributions to the Computation of Value

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages 1415-1424

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/npp.2017.302

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [PDFMP1-123113/1, PP00P1_128574, PP00P1_150739, 00014_165884]
  2. University of Zurich Forschungskredit grant [FK-16-016]
  3. ERC [295642]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PDFMP1-123113] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [295642] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dopamine is thought to play a crucial role in value-based decision making. However, the specific contributions of different dopamine receptor subtypes to the computation of subjective value remain unknown. Here we demonstrate how the balance between D1 and D2 dopamine receptor subtypes shapes subjective value computation during risky decision making. We administered the D2 receptor antagonist amisulpride or placebo before participants made choices between risky options. Compared with placebo, D2 receptor blockade resulted in more frequent choice of higher risk and higher expected value options. Using a novel model fitting procedure, we concurrently estimated the three parameters that define individual risk attitude according to an influential theoretical account of risky decision making (prospect theory). This analysis revealed that the observed reduction in risk aversion under amisulpride was driven by increased sensitivity to reward magnitude and decreased distortion of outcome probability, resulting in more linear value coding. Our data suggest that different components that govern individual risk attitude are under dopaminergic control, such that D2 receptor blockade facilitates risk taking and expected value processing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available