3.8 Proceedings Paper

Face Recognition Using Fisherface Method

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012119

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fisherface is one of the popular algorithms used in face recognition, and is widely believed to be superior to other techniques, such as eigenface because of the effort to maximize the separation between classes in the training process. The purpose of this research is to establish a program of face recognition application using fisherface method by utilizing GUI applications and databases that are used in the form of a Papuan facial image. Image recognition using fisherface method is based on the reduction of face space dimension using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method, then apply Fisher's Linear Discriminant (FDL) method or also known as Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) method to obtain feature of image characteristic. The algorithm used in the process for image recognition is fisherfaces algorithm while for identification or matching face image using minimum euclidean. The method used in this study is literature study that is studying and reviewing various books or literature related to mathematical concepts that underlies the formation of fisherface algorithm to recognize the image of a person's face which is then applied in programming language, especially programming language Matlab7.10. While in the process of preprocessing used Adobe Photoshop CS4 application program, its goal is to make the face image to be uniform in terms of size and format so that the image is ready to be used by the system. The results show that for image recognition where the image of testing is the same as the training image, the percentage of program success is 100%, while for 73 facial test images with various expressions and various positions, 70 faces are recognized correctly and 3 faces are recognized incorrectly, so the percentage of success is 93%..

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available