4.2 Article

Comparison of ambulatory capacity and disease progression of Duchenne muscular dystrophy subjects enrolled in the drisapersen DMD114673 study with a matched natural history cohort of subjects on daily corticosteroids

Journal

NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 203-213

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2016.11.013

Keywords

Duchenne muscular dystrophy; Antisense oligonucleotide; Comparative study; Exercise test; Dystrophin synthesis; Drug therapy

Funding

  1. GlaxoSmithKline [PRO051-02]
  2. BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. [DMD114673]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Duchenne muscular dystrophy is a rare genetic disorder with life-limiting pathology. Drisapersen induces exon 51 skipping, thereby producing a shorter but functional dystrophin protein. The longest available data are from an open-label extension study (PRO051-02) treating 12 boys with drisapersen (6 mg/kg/week subcutaneously). The median change (range) from baseline to week 177 in six-minute walking distance (6MWD) was 8 (-263, 163) metres. The current analysis aimed to put the results from PRO051-02 in the context of natural progression by comparing the functional trajectory of drisapersen-treated subjects to a matched natural history (NH) cohort, treated by standard of care. Subjects were matched individually by age and 6MWD, as the primary analysis, and by age and rise from floor (RFF), as sensitivity analysis. A total of 75 NH subjects were available for 6MWD analysis, of which matching was possible for 9 ambulant drisapersen-treated subjects. None of the 6 stable (baseline 6MWD 330 metres) drisapersen-treated subjects lost ambulation vs 4 out of 10 matched NH subjects over a comparable timeframe (similar to 3.4 years), compared with 2 out of 3 ambulant in decline drisapersen-treated subjects vs all 6 matched NH subjects. A total of 79 NH subjects were available for RFF analysis. For continuous ambulatory subjects (N = 4), the RFF decline was more pronounced in the NH cohort than in the drisapersentreated subjects. In conclusion, a comparison of ambulant drisapersen-treated subjects with matched NH subjects showed a difference in functional trajectories over a timeframe of up to 3.4 years in favour of drisapersen. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available