4.6 Article

Point-of-Care/Chairside aMMP-8 Analytics of Periodontal Diseases' Activity and Episodic Progression

Journal

DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics8040074

Keywords

matrix metalloproteinases; periodontal diseases; periodontitis; point-of-care testing

Funding

  1. Helsinki University Hospital Research Foundation, Finland [TYH 2016251, TYH 2017251, TYH 2018229, TYH 2019319, Y1014SL017, Y1014SL018]
  2. Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traditional periodontal disease diagnostics are based mainly on clinical examination and radiographs. They assess only past tissue destruction and provide no information on the current disease status or its future progression. The objective is to find out if an active matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) point-of-care (PoC) test could provide a cost-effective way to get around this limitation. This cross-sectional study used 47 adolescents and 70 adults, who were clinically examined and their aMMP-8 PoC tested. The aMMP-8 PoC test results and patients' treatment need, based on the community periodontal index of treatment needs (CPITN), were compared and analyzed using Fisher's exact test. In terms of CPITN, the aMMP-8 PoC test gave no false positives for both adolescents and adults. All healthy patients got a negative test result, while a positive test result indicated periodontal treatment need correctly. Finally, there was a significant association between a patient's aMMP-8 PoC test result and his/her treatment need (p = 0.001 for adolescents, p = 0.001 for adults). In conclusion, more accurate diagnostics of periodontal diseases' activity and progression using an aMMP-8 PoC test may help to reduce oral health care costs by reducing patient overtreatment, improving patient outcome, and reducing the need for complex periodontal therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available