4.3 Review

A review of self-report scales on restoration and/or restorativeness in the natural environment

Journal

JOURNAL OF LEISURE RESEARCH
Volume 49, Issue 3-5, Pages 151-176

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00222216.2018.1505159

Keywords

stress reduction theory; attention restoration theory; psychometrics; PICOS; PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis)

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan [MOST 105-2410-H-167-013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Restoration/restorativeness is defined as the recovery of diminished daily functions and capabilities, largely during people's free time. Research on recovery requires measurements of the degree of restoration/restorativeness, driving the development of self-report scales on recovery. This study reviews existing self-report restoration/restorativeness scales based on PICOS (population, intervention, comparator, outcome, and study design) and psychometrics to provide suggestions for future applications. Systematic search methods and a simple snowball process were conducted for the direct and explicit self-report scales on restoration/restorativeness published in journal articles. The Web of Science was used as the database. Among the identified 15 scales, only 3 have been adequately analyzed using psychometrics. Of these 3, the Perceived Restorativeness Scale has the best generalizability and sensitivity for measuring the attentional restorativeness perceived in the environment, while the Restoration Scale is most suitable for measuring the perceived change in psychophysiological and mental restoration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available