4.7 Article

CSF neurofilament light chain and phosphorylated tau 181 predict disease progression in PSP

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages E273-+

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004859

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Tau Consortium
  2. [R01AG038791]
  3. [U54NS092089]
  4. [T32 AG23481]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveTo determine the ability of CSF biomarkers to predict disease progression in progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP).MethodsWe compared the ability of baseline CSF -amyloid(1-42), tau, phosphorylated tau 181 (p-tau), and neurofilament light chain (NfL) concentrations, measured by INNO-BIA AlzBio3 or ELISA, to predict 52-week changes in clinical (PSP Rating Scale [PSPRS] and Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living [SEADL]), neuropsychological, and regional brain volumes on MRI using linear mixed effects models controlled for age, sex, and baseline disease severity, and Fisher F density curves to compare effect sizes in 50 patients with PSP. Similar analyses were done using plasma NfL measured by single molecule arrays in 141 patients.ResultsHigher CSF NfL concentration predicted more rapid decline (biomarker x time interaction) over 52 weeks in PSPRS (p = 0.004, false discovery rate-corrected) and SEADL (p = 0.008), whereas lower baseline CSF p-tau predicted faster decline on PSPRS (p = 0.004). Higher CSF tau concentrations predicted faster decline by SEADL (p = 0.004). The CSF NfL/p-tau ratio was superior for predicting change in PSPRS, compared to p-tau (p = 0.003) or NfL (p = 0.001) alone. Higher NfL concentrations in CSF or blood were associated with greater superior cerebellar peduncle atrophy (fixed effect, p 0.029 and 0.008, respectively).ConclusionsBoth CSF p-tau and NfL correlate with disease severity and rate of disease progression in PSP. The inverse correlation of p-tau with disease severity suggests a potentially different mechanism of tau pathology in PSP as compared to Alzheimer disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available