4.7 Article

Increased default-mode network centrality in cognitively impaired multiple sclerosis patients

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 88, Issue 10, Pages 952-960

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003689

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Dutch MS Research Foundation [14-358e, 13-820]
  2. Biogen Idec

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate how changes in functional network hierarchy determine cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: A cohort consisting of 332 patients with MS (age 48.1 +/- 611.0 years, symptom duration 14.6 +/- 8.4 years) and 96 healthy controls (HCs; age 45.9 +/- 10.4 years) underwent structural MRI, fMRI, and extensive neuropsychological testing. Patients were divided into 3 groups: cognitively impaired (CI; n - 87), mildly cognitively impaired (MCI; n - 65), and cognitively preserved (CP; n = 180). The functional importance of brain regions was quantified with degree centrality, the average strength of the functional connections of a brain region with the rest of the brain, and eigenvector centrality, which adds to this concept by adding additional weight to connections with brain hubs because these are known to be especially important. Centrality values were calculated for each gray matter voxel based on resting-state fMRI data, registered to standard space. Group differences were assessed with a cluster-wise permutation-based method corrected for age, sex, and education. Results: CI patients demonstrated widespread centrality increases compared to both HCs and CP patients, mainly in regions making up the default-mode network. Centrality decreases were similar in all patient groups compared to HCs, mainly in occipital and sensorimotor areas. Results were robust across centrality measures. Conclusions: Patients with MS with cognitive impairment show hallmark alterations in functional network hierarchy with increased relative importance (centrality) of the default-mode network.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available