4.4 Article

Characterization of the Natural Colloidal TiO2 Background in Soil

Journal

SEPARATIONS
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/separations5040050

Keywords

TiO2; extraction; soil; hydrodynamic chromatography; ICP-MS; natural nanoparticles

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation, research unit INTERNANO (FOR 1536 Mobility, aging and functioning of engineered inorganic nanoparticles at the aquatic-terrestrial interface) [SCHA849/16, KL 2909/1-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An increasing amount of TiO2 engineered nanoparticles (TNP) is released into soils and sediments, increasing the need for dedicated detection methods. Titanium is naturally present in soils at concentrations typically much higher than the estimated concentrations for TNP. Therefore, a precise knowledge of this natural background, including the colloidal fraction, is required for developing adapted strategies for detecting TNP. In this study, we characterized the natural colloidal Ti-background by analyzing eight soils with different properties and origins. A combination of X-ray fluorescence analysis and ICP-OES was used for determining the silicate bound fraction, which was a minor fraction for all soils (0-32%). The colloidal fraction obtained by extracting colloids from soil prior to ICP-OES measurements ranged between 0.3% and 7%. Electron microscopy and hydrodynamic chromatography confirmed that Ti in the form of colloids or larger particles was mostly present as TiO2 minerals with a fraction smaller than 100 nm. The size distribution mode of the extracted colloids determined using hydrodynamic chromatography ranged between 80 and 120 nm. The chromatograms suggested a broad size distribution with a significant portion below 100 nm. In addition to these data, we also discuss possible implications of our findings for the method development for detecting TNP in soils.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available