4.3 Article

Multi-Table Differential Correlation Analysis of Neuroanatomical and Cognitive Interactions in Turner Syndrome

Journal

NEUROINFORMATICS
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 81-93

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12021-017-9351-z

Keywords

Permutation tests; Multi-table analysis; Sparse canonical correlation analysis; Turner syndrome; Tensor-based morphometry; Cognitive abilities

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [146281, 158500]
  2. France-Stanford Center for Interdisciplinary Studies
  3. Gazit-Globe Post-Doctoral Fellowship Award
  4. NICHD [HD049653]
  5. NIMH [MH099630]
  6. Sharon Levine Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Girls and women with Turner syndrome (TS) have a completely or partially missing X chromosome. Extensive studies on the impact of TS on neuroanatomy and cognition have been conducted. The integration of neuroanatomical and cognitive information into one consistent analysis through multi-table methods is difficult and most standard tests are underpowered. We propose a new two-sample testing procedure that compares associations between two tables in two groups. The procedure combines multi-table methods with permutation tests. In particular, we construct cluster size test statistics that incorporate spatial dependencies. We apply our new procedure to a newly collected dataset comprising of structural brain scans and cognitive test scores from girls with TS and healthy control participants (age and sex matched). We measure neuroanatomy with Tensor-Based Morphometry (TBM) and cognitive function with Wechsler IQ and NEuroPSYchological tests (NEPSY-II). We compare our multi-table testing procedure to a single-table analysis. Our new procedure reports differential correlations between two voxel clusters and a wide range of cognitive tests whereas the single-table analysis reports no differences. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that girls with TS have a different brain-cognition association structure than healthy controls.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available