4.7 Article

Predicting brain age with deep learning from raw imaging data results in a reliable and heritable biomarker

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 163, Issue -, Pages 115-124

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.059

Keywords

Brain ageing; Neuroimaging; Reliability; Heritability; Biomarker; Deep learning; Convolutional neural networks; Gaussian processes

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. Medical Research Council [MR/L022141/1]
  3. European Commisionamp
  4. amp
  5. amp
  6. amp
  7. amp
  8. amp
  9. amp
  10. amp
  11. amp
  12. amp
  13. apos
  14. s Seventh Framework Program (FP7) [259749]
  15. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), BioResource, Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre
  16. Kingamp
  17. apos
  18. s College London
  19. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
  20. EPSRC Doctoral Departmental Scholarship
  21. MRC [MR/L022141/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  22. Medical Research Council [MR/L022141/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Machine learning analysis of neuroimaging data can accurately predict chronological age in healthy people. Deviations from healthy brain ageing have been associated with cognitive impairment and disease. Here we sought to further establish the credentials of 'brain-predicted age' as a biomarker of individual differences in the brain ageing process, using a predictive modelling approach based on deep learning, and specifically convolutional neural networks (CNN), and applied to both pre-processed and raw T1-weighted MRI data. Firstly, we aimed to demonstrate the accuracy of CNN brain-predicted age using a large dataset of healthy adults (N = 2001). Next, we sought to establish the heritability of brain-predicted age using a sample of monozygotic and dizygotic female twins (N = 62). Thirdly, we examined the test-retest and multi-centre reliability of brain-predicted age using two samples (within-scanner N = 20; between-scanner N = 11). CNN brain-predicted ages were generated and compared to a Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) approach, on all datasets. Input data were grey matter (GM) or white matter (WM) volumetric maps generated by Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) or raw data. CNN accurately predicted chronological age using GM (correlation between brain-predicted age and chronological age r = 0.96, mean absolute error [MAE] = 4.16 years) and raw (r = 0.94, MAE = 4.65 years) data. This was comparable to GPR brain-predicted age using GM data (r = 0.95, MAE = 4.66 years). Brain-predicted age was a heritable phenotype for all models and input data (h(2) >= 0.5). Brain-predicted age showed high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.90-0.99). Multi-centre reliability was more variable within high ICCs for GM (0.83-0.96) and poor-moderate levels for WM and raw data (0.51-0.77). Brain-predicted age represents an accurate, highly reliable and genetically-influenced phenotype, that has potential to be used as a biomarker of brain ageing. Moreover, age predictions can be accurately generated on raw T1-MRI data, substantially reducing computation time for novel data, bringing the process closer to giving realtime information on brain health in clinical settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available