4.7 Article

Investigating white matter fibre density and morphology using fixel-based analysis

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages 58-73

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.029

Keywords

Diffusion; MRI; Fixel; Fibre; Density; Cross-section

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia [400121]
  2. Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program
  3. UK Medical Research Council [MR/J014257/2]
  4. Wellcome Trust [091593/Z/10/Z]
  5. MRC [MR/J014257/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Medical Research Council [MR/J014257/2] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Voxel-based analysis of diffusion MRI data is increasingly popular. However, most white matter voxels contain contributions from multiple fibre populations (often referred to as crossing fibres), and therefore voxel-averaged quantitative measures (e.g. fractional anisotropy) are not fibre-specific and have poor interpretability. Using higher-order diffusion models, parameters related to fibre density can be extracted for individual fibre populations within each voxel ('fixels'), and recent advances in statistics enable the multi-subject analysis of such data. However, investigating within-voxel microscopic fibre density alone does not account for macroscopic differences in the white matter morphology (e.g. the calibre of a fibre bundle). In this work, we introduce a novel method to investigate the latter, which we call fixel-based morphometry (FBM). To obtain a more complete measure related to the total number of white matter axons, information from both within-voxel microscopic fibre density and macroscopic morphology must be combined. We therefore present the FBM method as an integral piece within a comprehensive fixelbased analysis framework to investigate measures of fibre density, fibre-bundle morphology (cross., section), and a combined measure of fibre density and cross-section. We performed simulations to demonstrate the proposed measures using various transformations of a numerical fibre bundle phantom. Finally, we provide an example of such an analysis by comparing a clinical patient group to a healthy control group, which demonstrates that all three measures provide distinct and complementary information. By capturing information from both sources, the combined fibre density and cross-section measure is likely to be more sensitive to certain pathologies and more directly interpretable. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available