4.4 Article

Functional Improvement Among Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH) Survivors up to 12 Months Post-injury

Journal

NEUROCRITICAL CARE
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 326-333

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12028-017-0425-4

Keywords

Intracerebral hemorrhage; Prognosis; Outcome research; Cohort studies

Funding

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [TL1TR000141]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As survival rates have increased for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients, there is limited information regarding recovery beyond 3-6 months. This study was conducted to examine recovery curves using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Barthel Index (BI) up to 12 months post-injury. We prospectively enrolled 173 patients admitted with ICH who were subsequently evaluated using the mRS and BI at discharge as well as 3, 6, and 12 months. Repeated measures nonparametric testing was conducted to assess functional trajectories across time. The mRS scores showed significant improvement between discharge (median 4) and 3 (median 4), 6 (median 4), and 12 months (median 3) (p values < 0.001). However, the mRS scores did not differ between follow-up time-points (i.e., 3-6, 6-12 months). There was significant improvement in scores using the BI (p values < 0.001), showing improvement between discharge (mean 43.0) and 3 (mean 73.0), 6 (mean 78.2), and 12 months (mean 83.4). Additionally, there were differences in the BI between 3 and 12 months (p = 0.013), as well as between 6 and 12 months (p = 0.025). The BI may be a more sensitive measure of long-term recovery post-injury than the mRS, which shows minimal improvement for some survivors after 3 months. BI scores indicate survivors continually improve till 12 months post-injury. These results may have implications for the prognostication of ICH and design of clinical trial outcome measures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available