4.6 Article

The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: The Two-season ACTPol Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect Selected Cluster Catalog

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
Volume 235, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/aaa6cb

Keywords

cosmology: large-scale structure of universe; cosmology: observations; galaxies: clusters: general

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [AST-1440226, AST-0965625, AST-0408698]
  2. Princeton University
  3. University of Pennsylvania
  4. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  5. Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica de Chile (CONICYT)
  6. CFI under Compute Canada
  7. Government of Ontario
  8. Ontario Research Fund-Research Excellence
  9. University of Toronto
  10. NASA [NNX13AE56G, NNX14AB58G, NNX14AF73G, ATP NNX14AB57G]
  11. National Research Foundation
  12. South African Square Kilometre Array project
  13. University of KwaZulu-Natal
  14. Lyman Spitzer Jr. Fellowship
  15. NSF [AST-1615657, AST-1312991, AST-1312380]
  16. ERC [259505, 267117]
  17. Labex ILP part of the Idex SUPER [ANR-10-LABX-63]
  18. DOE [DE-SC0011114]
  19. NASA Space Technology Research Fellowships
  20. CONICYT [FONDECYT 1141113, Anillo ACT-1417, QUIMAL 160009, BASAL PFB-06 CATA]
  21. CONICYT FONDECYT [3170846]
  22. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
  23. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  24. Mishrahi Fund
  25. Wilkinson Fund
  26. Rutgers University
  27. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  28. National Science Foundation
  29. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  30. FIRST program from the Japanese Cabinet Office
  31. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)
  32. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  33. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  34. Toray Science Foundation
  35. NAOJ
  36. Kavli IPMU
  37. KEK
  38. ASIAA
  39. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX08AR22G]
  40. National Science Foundation [AST-1238877]
  41. ESO Very Large Telescope, under the Large Programme [182.A-0886]
  42. [PHY-1214379]
  43. [PHY-0855887]
  44. [ANR-11-IDEX-0004-02]
  45. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  46. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1312380, 1440226, 1615657] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  47. NASA [NNX14AF73G, 684366] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  48. ESRC [ES/N013956/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a catalog of 182 galaxy clusters detected through the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect by the Atacama Cosmology Telescope in a contiguous 987.5 deg(2) field. The clusters were detected as SZ decrements by applying a matched filter to 148 GHz maps that combine the original ACT equatorial survey with data from the first two observing seasons using the ACTPol receiver. Optical/IR confirmation and redshift measurements come from a combination of large public surveys and our own follow-up observations. Where necessary, we measured photometric redshifts for clusters using a pipeline that achieves accuracy Delta z/(1 + z) = 0.015 when tested on Sloan Digital Sky Survey data. Under the assumption that clusters can be described by the so-called universal pressure profile (UPP) and its associated mass scaling law, the full signal-to-noise ratio > 4 sample spans the mass range 1.6 < M-500c(UPP)/10(14) M-circle dot < 9.1, with median M-500c(UPP) = 3.1 x 10(14) M-circle dot. The sample covers the redshift range 0.1 < z < 1.4 (median z = 0.49), and 28 clusters are new discoveries (median z = 0.80). We compare our catalog with other overlapping cluster samples selected using the SZ, optical, and X-ray wavelengths. We find that the ratio of the UPP-based SZ mass to richness-based weak-lensing mass is < M-500c(UPP)>/< M-500c(lambda WL)> = 0.68 +/- 0.11. After applying this calibration, the mass distribution for clusters with M-500c > 4 x 10(14) M-circle dot is consistent with the number of such clusters found in the South Pole Telescope SZ survey.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available