4.6 Article

Exploiting distinctive topological constraint of local feature matching for logo image recognition

Journal

NEUROCOMPUTING
Volume 236, Issue -, Pages 113-122

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.08.110

Keywords

Local feature matching; Distinctive topological constraint; Feature selection; Logo image recognition

Funding

  1. National Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2014AA015102]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61371128, 61532005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Robust local feature matching plays an important role in the challenging task of logo image recognition. Most traditional methods consider the individual local feature but ignore the affine-invariant geometric relationship among the adjacent local features, which is essential to reduce the number of mismatching. In addition, they do matching for all of the local features and ignore that many ones are insignificant, which increase the probability of mismatching and the computation complexity. To address the two limitations, we propose a robust matching method to get the better matching results by exploiting the distinctive topological constraint together with the feature selection. In the proposed method, first we employ the distinctive topological constraint to enhance the describing ability of local features, which makes full use of the affine-invariant geometric relationship among adjacent local features for more accurate local feature matching. Second, we utilize the feature selection algorithm based on the mutual information (MI), to filter out most insignificant local features before matching, which is efficient and effective to guarantee the performance of local feature matching. We evaluated the proposed method on two challenging datasets, i.e, FlickrLogos-32 and FlickrLogos-27, and achieve superior performance against the state-of-the-art methods in the literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available